<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dotcomslashblog - Latest Comments in 10 Years of iMac, Same Old</title><link>http://dotcomslashblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dotcomslashblog.disqus.com/10_years_of_imac_same_old/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:03:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 10 Years of iMac, Same Old</title><link>http://nilsgeylen.com/blog/10-years-of-imac-same-old/#comment-2777293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Me too, guilty on counts one, two and three. Good thing their stuff doesn't "age" quickly; older Apple hardware is cheaper, just as cool and still works great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nap Fisker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Years of iMac, Same Old</title><link>http://nilsgeylen.com/blog/10-years-of-imac-same-old/#comment-2777292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple has a great marketing scheme.  I love their stuff.  Just wish I could afford it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had no idea it was 10 years now though :).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:35:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>