<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dotcomslashblog - Latest Comments in 5 Things That Are Wrong With Firefox</title><link>http://dotcomslashblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dotcomslashblog.disqus.com/5_things_that_are_wrong_with_firefox/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:58:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 5 Things That Are Wrong With Firefox</title><link>http://nilsgeylen.com/blog/5-things-that-are-wrong-with-firefox/#comment-2777301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chr0m3 ftw!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nap Fisker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Things That Are Wrong With Firefox</title><link>http://nilsgeylen.com/blog/5-things-that-are-wrong-with-firefox/#comment-2777304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All of these are kind of true, but if they're suggesting people use IE instead, they're mistaken.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chrome Chrome Chrome! :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Smaran</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Things That Are Wrong With Firefox</title><link>http://nilsgeylen.com/blog/5-things-that-are-wrong-with-firefox/#comment-2777303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point. I can see why you need upgrades when technology changes or new technology emerges, but the continuous tinkering with features? Indeed, often that's just a marketing strategy instead of a desire to perfect the app or the UI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nap Fisker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:35:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Things That Are Wrong With Firefox</title><link>http://nilsgeylen.com/blog/5-things-that-are-wrong-with-firefox/#comment-2777302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Firefox is still fine, but I fail to see why they need to add features. Why does software always get new features, never left at the status quo when and where it works?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:50:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>