Dotcomslashblog - Latest Comments in The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Re: The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Nap Fisker — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:11:17 -0000

Interesting they'd have a couple of cases of a beer they don't produce (wouldn't be possible/allowed I suppose) nor import.

But then again, it's a good thing they make the effort to inform their visitors. Nice to see you have a small brewery like that right where you live.

If you're ever in Antwerp, do visit our De Coninck brewery.

Re: The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Adem — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:04:02 -0000

Just seen your new post now. I had the Geuze at a local independant brewery where they'd brought a few cases on their last visit. Amazing that the stuff can take five years to brew where as most ales/lagers only take seven days.

Re: The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Nap Fisker — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:08:55 -0000

Ha, yeah, Geuze is well-know and a good choice. And if it helps you comment, you should drink more :)

In fact, I have a post in the works that mentions Geuze – be it in a roundabout way. Keep an eye out for that then.

Re: The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Adem — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 05:54:15 -0000

Yep, very interesting and strange how we assume that the larger/popular company is the originator or the design and that those smaller companies must be the imitators.

Talking of things reminding us of other things. I was sampling some Gueuze on Saturday and I thought of you, being the only resident of Belgium that I know. Just thought I'd mention it and it reminded me that I hadn't commented around here for a while so I should pop on over.

Re: The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Nap Fisker — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:23:10 -0000

Thank you. You know I was trying to come across as particularly knowledgeable here of course :)

Re: The Twitter Logo, Or Is It?

Joe Drinker — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:52:17 -0000

Interesting...that's the first time I remember a brand mark being known by association rather than the actual logo. Nice observation.